(LifeSiteNews) — I recently wrote about specific technologies which can affect the human brain and other locations of the body and can be used for torture. Those technologies are sometimes described as “Directed Energy Weapons” or “Directed Energy Systems.”
A significant point made in one of my articles is that Directed Energy Weapons and Systems use radio frequency, infrared, or other electromagnetic energy and can secretly focus that energy onto a specific group or a specific person within that group to cause harm.
Basically, Directed Energy Weapons and Directed Energy Systems commonly use electromagnetic technologies from a remote and secret location and then focus that energy on a small target sometimes hundreds of yards away.
According to a U.S. government study, the directed energy systems can also be focused on specific locations in the brain: “Intracranial focusing is possible depending on the incident angle of the incoming RF [radio frequency] radiation” (Page 60).
The U.S. government statement is significant and cannot be overemphasized.
Scientists already describe Directed Energy Weapons which can be used remotely and secretly for brain or body torture; this is implied, without using the word “torture,” in a 2020 U.S. National Academy of Sciences Consensus Study Report as summarized in a Congressional Bill which provided for punishment of foreigners who use Directed Energy Weapons for attacks against American government employees in Havana, Cuba and other locations:
A 2020 report by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) found that “many of the distinctive and acute signs, symptoms, and observations reported by [affected] employees are consistent with the effects of directed, pulsed radio frequency (RF) energy” and that “directed pulsed RF energy … appears to be the most plausible mechanism in explaining these cases”.
According to the NAS report, “such a scenario raises grave concerns about a world with disinhibited malevolent actors and new tools for causing harm to others.”
Importantly, the 2021 Congressional Bill also notes that some of these attacks with secret directed energy weapons also reportedly occurred in the United States:
The number and locations of these attacks have significantly expanded and, according to press reporting, as of May 2021 there have been more than 130 possible cases that have occurred in Asia, in Europe, and in the Western Hemisphere, including within the United States.
According to press reporting, these attacks have occurred, among other places, at the homes of United States personnel, at hotels, and on public streets, including in the immediate vicinity of the White House, in Washington, DC.
This is significant and will be mentioned again in a moment: Directed Energy Weapons have reportedly been used on Americans in the United States.
READ: How the UN uses COVID to usher in a global police state
A separate Congressional Bill introduced in the House of Representatives provides a discussion on the ability to focus directed energy on a target:
Directed energy platforms are electromagnetic systems capable of converting chemical or electrical energy to radiated energy and focusing it on a target, resulting in physical damage that degrades or neutralizes an adversarial capability. These systems include high-energy lasers that emit photons and high-power microwaves that release radiofrequency waves.
Some might not realize how significant it is that electromagnetic systems can be focused on a target “resulting in physical damage.” This means that almost any person’s serious injury or death could be secretly and remotely caused by law enforcement or others with such weapons and then simply blamed on “natural causes.”
Some might also not realize how significant it is that Congress and Presidents apparently have not made such technologies illegal for entities like the FBI, local police, intelligence community, and other “security” or “law enforcement” entities in America. (It is necessary here to again emphasize a point made in a previous article, which was that a U.S. government listing suggested that law enforcement in America use microwave weapons, a type of directed energy weapon, on Americans. The listing describes that such weapons were already achieved, and the listing also describes that such weapons could be directed at a crowd or one person’s brain.)
Thus, a reasonable person might say that weapons and systems such as directed energy weapons and systems which could potentially be improved enough to be used for secret torture, secretly causing death.
One might say that although nuclear weapons harm people in a different way, such “directed energy weapons and systems” are at least as dangerous as nuclear weapons; others might say that, in at least one way, directed energy weapons are more dangerous than nuclear weapons because they could be used to secretly cause targeted peoples’ deaths and make those deaths appear to be caused by “natural causes” such as brain aneurysms, heart attacks, etc., while it is likely somewhat difficult to hide a nuclear bomb attack. Directed Energy Weapons could injure or cause the death of the same number of people as nuclear weapons, but they could cause the harm or death in a way that appears to be merely “natural” or a natural cause.
Thus, laws on nuclear weapons are relevant to this discussion. A U.S. Federal law prohibiting atomic weapons is partially provided as follows:
It shall be unlawful […] for any person, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any atomic weapon.
It should not be a very controversial law. How many Americans disagree with the above atomic weapon law?
And because of their potential to secretly and remotely cause harm to Americans, how many Americans would disagree with Congress making a similar law on directed energy weapons and systems? Consider the following potential wording, which substitutes Directed Energy Weapons and Surveillance Systems for atomic weapon in the wording above and specifies prohibitions for law enforcement and others:
It shall be unlawful for any person, including law enforcement, local, state, and Federal police, FBI, intelligence entities, and any other government or non-government entity, inside or outside of the United States, to knowingly participate in the development of, manufacture, produce, transfer, acquire, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use, any Directed Energy Weapon or System, including any Directed Energy System used for surveillance.
How many people would disagree with such a law? (Of course, the words would have to be accurately defined; medical technologies used in medical facilities with a patient’s consent would obviously not be included. Enforcement employees would have to be able to confiscate and destroy such illegal weapons in America; this would require honest and trustworthy enforcement employees which may be difficult to find. The point being made here is that all Americans, including law enforcement, police, FBI, intelligence entities, and others, should be severely punished for the importing, exporting, acquiring, use of, etc., such directed energy weapons and surveillance systems.) Such a law should not be controversial.
What would be controversial and severely problematic, though, is if Congress wrote a Bill which did not make such Directed Energy Weapons illegal both “inside or outside of the United States,” or if Congress wrote a Bill which only punishes foreigners – and not Americans or American government employees like FBI, local police, etc. – for the use of Directed Energy Weapons.
In fact, a reasonable person might go as far as suspecting that those weapons are currently secretly being used in America against Americans if Congress avoids wording in Congressional Bills which provides for the punishment of Americans and/or American government employees like FBI, police, etc. for the use of those weapons.
And that is precisely what some of Congress recently apparently attempted to do: only punish foreigners for their use of Directed Energy Weapons. It is described in a Congressional Bill. A summary of the Bill is provided by the U.S. government:
This bill requires the President to sanction foreign persons and governments for carrying out clandestine attacks on U.S. personnel that have caused brain injury.
The rest of the Bill can be read here. How difficult would it be to include a paragraph in the Bill similar to the one suggested above, which makes it unlawful for FBI, police, etc., to acquire, use, produce, possess, etc., directed energy weapons and systems, including surveillance systems, inside or outside the United States?
It is especially relevant that the same Congressional Bill clearly mentions that such directed energy weapons were suspected to be used in America against Americans. Wouldn’t one reasonably suspect that American government employees, including FBI and police, might use those weapons against Americans?
The fact that Congress avoided making them illegal in America seems to be very significant and suggests, at minimum, that Directed Energy Weapons might be currently secretly in use against Americans. Again, it has to be emphasized that a U.S. government listing suggested that such remote and secret weapons be used by “law enforcement” in America. Thus, there is reasonable suspicion that those weapons might be used by law enforcement in America. Americans should be demanding that Congress require that such weapons be made illegal “inside and outside of the United States.”
Additionally, similar to a separate Congressional Bill which became law (known as the HAVANA Act of 2021), Congress should require compensation for those who “incur brain injuries from hostilities” as a result of government Directed Energy Weapons. For example, a person who incurred a brain aneurysm rupture or others who experienced unexplained neurological effects and are known to have opposition within law enforcement or other government entities might be able to receive some justice if laws include compensation for injuries, if, of course, law enforcement or other government entities used those secret weapons.
There is more to mention about the HAVANA Act of 2021, although only briefly. It is significant that the HAVANA Act of 2021 applies retroactively, as it states that “The bill’s authority applies to injuries incurred before, on, or after the date of the bill’s enactment.” Thus, a Congressional Bill making Directed Energy Weapons use illegal inside or outside the United States could be written to have “authority which applies to Directed Energy Weapons used before, on, or after the date of the bill’s enactment.”
Such a Bill could also have incentives for current government employees and employees of technology producers to publicly inform on anyone who has “knowingly participated in the development of, manufacturing, producing, transferring, acquiring, receiving, possessing, importing, exporting, or use, or possess and threaten of use,” of any Directed Energy Weapon or System, including any Directed Energy System used for surveillance.
If Directed Energy Weapons or Systems have not been used inside the United States, then such a law would then only apply to the future, and no current or previous government employees or other scientists would have anything to worry about.
Of course, the fact that there have reportedly been attacks using Directed Energy Weapons in America but Congress began to attempt to punish only foreigners for the use of such technologies might suggest that some, or many, U.S. or local government officials might have significant problems if laws prohibiting Directed Energy Weapons were enacted. (That is, of course, if there is a true and honest justice system in America or in at least a few locations in America. There might not be much of an honest justice system in America.)
And there is much more to discuss on this subject, but I will take it up in a subsequent essay.
READ: Former Michigan gubernatorial candidate sentenced to jail for January 6 protest